Comments on: Review: Cathay Pacific Premium Economy B777-300ER, NY to Vancouver https://www.travelcodex.com/review-cathay-pacific-premium-economy-b77w-jfk-yvr/ Your Resource for Better Travel Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:42:10 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2 By: MeanMeosh https://www.travelcodex.com/review-cathay-pacific-premium-economy-b77w-jfk-yvr/#comment-535567 Tue, 04 Feb 2020 15:42:10 +0000 https://www.travelcodex.com/?p=477339#comment-535567 Yes – I did make brief mention of that in the second paragraph:

Note that unfortunately, shortly before I took this flight, Cathay announced plans to discontinue the JFK-Vancouver route. Currently, the route is scheduled to end on March 28th

]]> By: MeanMeosh https://www.travelcodex.com/review-cathay-pacific-premium-economy-b77w-jfk-yvr/#comment-535564 Tue, 04 Feb 2020 03:30:48 +0000 https://www.travelcodex.com/?p=477339#comment-535564 That’s fair. Honestly the look of the seats ranks pretty low for me in Premium Economy, so it doesn’t bother me all that much. But yeah, I can see how some might not like it. I look more at seat comfort/soft product, where I think CX does well.

]]> By: MeanMeosh https://www.travelcodex.com/review-cathay-pacific-premium-economy-b77w-jfk-yvr/#comment-535555 Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:09:47 +0000 https://www.travelcodex.com/?p=477339#comment-535555 I have to disagree. 38″ pitch/19.5″ width is closer to domestic F than standard Y, but more importantly, I found it quite comfortable as it was well padded. The soft product, especially the meals, were significantly better than coach IMO. AA’s PE seat is good and all, but I just don’t see it as markedly better than CX.

]]>